[XviD-devel] bframes 'user' tests
Christoph Lampert
xvid-devel@xvid.org
Sun, 21 Jul 2002 00:02:16 +0200 (CEST)
Hi,
B-frames direct mode is still too buggy to test quality.
You can remove the comment from the the line
// d_sad16 = 65535;
in src/xvidcore/motion/motion_est.c
Then direct mode will not be used and you can test b-frames
more reliable.
gruel
--------------------------------
On Sat, 20 Jul 2002, Edouard Gomez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I know bframes are still beta. But as the bframes support is getting
> better each day, i thought some real test cases could show "big" bugs
> in the bframe's code.
>
> Here are the options i've used :
>
> [export_xvidcvs.so] multi-pass session: 0
> [export_xvidcvs.so] quality: 0
> [export_xvidcvs.so] bitrate [kBits/s]: 710
> [export_xvidcvs.so] max keyframe interval: 250
> [export_xvidcvs.so] max bframe sequence: 1
> [export_xvidcvs.so] bframe quant ratio: 140
> [export_xvidcvs.so] motion flags: PMV_HALFPELREFINE16
> PMV_EXTSEARCH16
> PMV_EARLYSTOP16
> PMV_USESQUARES16
> PMV_HALFPELREFINE8
> PMV_EARLYSTOP8
> [export_xvidcvs.so] global flags: XVID_GLOBAL_DX50BVOP
> [export_xvidcvs.so] general flags: XVID_H263QUANT
> XVID_HALFPEL
> XVID_ADAPTIVEQUANT
> XVID_INTER4V
> [export_xvidcvs.so] cpu flags: XVID_CPU_MMX
> XVID_CPU_MMXEXT
> XVID_CPU_SSE
> XVID_CPU_TSC
> [export_xvidcvs.so] frame rate: 25.00
> [export_xvidcvs.so] color space: YV12
>
> Test clip : "The Fith Element" DVD source / frames 0-5000
> Original frame size : 720x578
> Encoded frame size : 608x256
>
> Software used : transcode 0.6.0 pre3 + bframe patch for xvidcvs module
>
> 1 - BFrame encoding speed.
>
> Nothing to say here, the loss is just 1 frame/s encoding. Great work !
>
> 2 - BFrame visual quality
>
> Well, i know there's still lot of work in this area, i would just give
> my opinion. When the max_bframes >=2 the quality gets worse very quick
> when there's a bit of motion. Moreover the current default for the
> bquant_ratio seems to be too high. With a ratio of 200 (default) the
> quantizer become too big (quality is poor - normal). The 125-140 range
> gives good results and the bitstream size is still reduced by a 1/4
> ratio (IP encoding is 20Mo, IPB encoding is ~15Mo with a ratio of
> 140).
>
> 3 - Visual artifacts surely due to bugs
>
> If someone asks me, i'll post the clip.
>
> There's a bug in the code because some MBlocks diplay just as black
> squares even in bright zones (chroma is ~0 too). Moreover,
> mplayer+libavcodec reports some "Bad MPEG4 header - broken or missing"
> when max_bframes is >= 2. I can't reproduce this bug each time, but
> there's for sure something wrong with the generated bitstream.
>
> In order to sumarize :
> - MBlocks are wrong sometimes
> - bitstream is not well formed when max_bframes >= 2
>
> The bitstream error might cause the first one ?
>
>
> I hope this could help bframes developers (well i know this bug report
> sux a lot, it lacks of details :-)
>
> --
> Edouard Gomez
> _______________________________________________
> XviD-devel mailing list
> XviD-devel@xvid.org
> http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel
>
--
Christoph H. Lampert chl@math.uni-bonn.de | Diese Signature wurde maschi-
Beringstr. 6, Raum 14 Tel. (0228) 73-2948 | nell erstellt und bedarf
Sprechstunden: keine, aber meistens da | keiner Unterschrift. AZ 27B-6