[XviD-devel] Decoder performance
Edouard Gomez
ed.gomez at free.fr
Sat Aug 9 21:23:07 CEST 2003
Christoph Lampert (chl at math.uni-bonn.de) wrote:
> Hm, can't you handle this differently? From all I know, integer division
> isn't pipelined on any CPU architecture. For dividing by constants,
> compilers replace this by shift+some rounding trick, but when dividing
> by some variable, at least gcc doesn't manage to:
The point of the patches (whichever one) was just to do more compact
code, more predicatble removing these annoying if(dec->quarterpel) all
other the MB functions code. Using shifts or just divide did both help
in avoiding the problems related to the "ifs". None is really faster
than the other.
I think the reduced VOP stuff is also slowing things down (not so
numerous as if(dec->quaterpel) but ...)
Btw, i implemented your shifting algo. I see no difference in my tests
(nor speed nor quality) (though i did not see neither with my first
buggy patch).
The changes i've done are now commented, so LUTs may be more
understandable for dbquant and mbtype.
See attachment.
--
Edouard Gomez
More information about the XviD-devel
mailing list