[XviD-devel] [f]emms / intrisics

[Christoph Lampert]

On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, suxen_drol wrote:
> 
> the emms_mmx and emms_3dn functions could be moved to nasm to avoid
> compiler problems... and avoid having to defined EMMS() macros in
> portab.h. 

They are only 1 instruction, aren't they? 
So nasming them would be kind of overhead...

> 
> or, would y'all rather switch intrinsics?


Your decision... I don't care, I don't speak ASM (except for 68K & MIPS).

Would we get all our current NASM code transformed into intrisitrics?
Or should we run both in parallel then? 



Let's cast a vote: 

--------

* Should we change from NASM to intrisics? 

Please make your cross here (no dimpled chats, please)

O yes    O no    O don't care   O don't know what it means

--------