[XviD-devel] Re: qpel smearing/noise problem
xvid-devel@xvid.org
xvid-devel@xvid.org
Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:16:33 +0800
&9,0%H MIME .f&!<g&(*:&h;y0T.'!C
--=_alternative 0012029948256CAA_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>Hi
>On Thursday 09 January 2003 16:41, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> On Thursday 09 January 2003 16:13, Christoph Lampert wrote:
>> > On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> > The reference software is correct (well, in fact the standard has
been
>> > modified to be in compliance with the software. That's a clever way
>> > of debugging: leave the software as it is, instead modify the specs.
)
>>
>> ok, i believe u both, ill fix ffmpeg
>ok, done
>btw i allso reproduced the IDCT qpel difference problem
>(see http://www.mplayerhq.hu/~michael/qpel-test.avi) for the video, its
>encoded with qpel / simpleidct with different constant qpel vectors in
>different areas of the image, it cant be decoded without artifacts with a
>different IDCT, allthough its a unfair test as the constant pattern with
>constant vectors will lead to a catastrophic accumulation of errors (if a
>IDCT "error" ever happens in a block, then it will very likely happen
over
>and over again for the same block ...)
>
>[...]
>
>Michael
So... is it the problem I sent in XviD mailing list last October?
([XviD-devel] Quarterpel problem.)
--
Jeanson Hung
BU2, ADMtek Inc.
Phone: 03-5788879-521
--=_alternative 0012029948256CAA_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">>Hi<br>
<br>
>On Thursday 09 January 2003 16:41, Michael Niedermayer wrote:<br>
>> On Thursday 09 January 2003 16:13, Christoph Lampert wrote:<br>
>> > On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Michael Niedermayer wrote:<br>
>> > The reference software is correct (well, in fact the standard has been<br>
>> > modified to be in compliance with the software. That's a clever way<br>
>> > of debugging: leave the software as it is, instead modify the specs. )<br>
>><br>
>> ok, i believe u both, ill fix ffmpeg<br>
>ok, done<br>
<br>
>btw i allso reproduced the IDCT qpel difference problem <br>
>(see http://www.mplayerhq.hu/~michael/qpel-test.avi) for the video, its <br>
>encoded with qpel / simpleidct with different constant qpel vectors in <br>
>different areas of the image, it cant be decoded without artifacts with a <br>
>different IDCT, allthough its a unfair test as the constant pattern with <br>
>constant vectors will lead to a catastrophic accumulation of errors (if a <br>
>IDCT "error" ever happens in a block, then it will very likely happen over <br>
>and over again for the same block ...)<br>
><br>
>[...]<br>
><br>
>Michael</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">So... is it the problem I sent in XviD mailing list last October? </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">([XviD-devel] Quarterpel problem.)</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New"><br>
</font><font size=2 face="sans-serif">--<br>
Jeanson Hung<br>
BU2, ADMtek Inc. <br>
Phone: 03-5788879-521 </font>
<br>
--=_alternative 0012029948256CAA_=--