[XviD-devel] Mode decision

[Christoph Lampert]

On 26 Mar 2003, skal wrote:
> > After all, there is not reason why INTER4V
> > should make things _worse_ at all in any case, except for a bad
> > implementation.  
> 	or bad criterion: in your orignal mail, the figure you showed
> 	displayed a strong overlap of blocks wrongly qualified as 4MV.
> 	So there's *also* room for improving the final choice
> 	sad16<sum_of_sad8...
> 
> 	Did I overlook sthg?

I meant "bad implementation" as "bad full inter4v encoding process,
including bad search and/or a bad mode decision criterion". You are of
course right. Current SAD based INTER/INTER4V decision sucks!
 
gruel