[XviD-devel] re: BITS
syskin at ihug.com.au
syskin at ihug.com.au
Mon May 12 20:52:23 CEST 2003
Hi,
gruel wrote
> Maybe one shouldn't just compare BITS, but use the usual lagrangian R-D
> value = lambda*bits + distorsion
> where lambda = 0.85 * quant*quant (for MSE distorsion measure)
> or some similar value (e.g. 1 to 1.15 was better in my tests).
That would probably be much better :) I wonder how slow would it be... I'll do
that.
> But my real question is: Why was encoding _faster_ when BITS was activated
> for halfpelrefine. I can imagine BITS for whole search being faster, if
> the search terminates much too early. But refinement is always done. How
> can a slower refinement step speed up the encoding?
I haven't even noticed that... so yes, it's definitely buggy.
Radek
More information about the XviD-devel
mailing list