[XviD-devel] Am I crazy?
Radek Czyz
syskin at ihug.com.au
Mon Apr 19 09:05:36 CEST 2004
Jim Hauxwell wrote:
> The other thing I need point out is last time I checked GCC wasn't as good
> as visual studio as a compiler. There may be a performance drop by moving
> to it.
Yeah, this is why I was thinking that we could - for starters - just
move assembler files from nasm to gcc's inline assembler, and leave it
there. There shouldn't be any impact (especially negative) if we do just
that.
This will be enough to get debug info needed for profiling, and would be
a "base" for any future intrinsics fun. We can't even start with
intrinsics if we stick to nasm (well, ok, I know, there are some tricks).
Note that I don't want to use gcc for files which can be compiled by
visual studio.
Radek
More information about the XviD-devel
mailing list