[XviD-devel] Am I crazy?

[Christoph Lampert]

On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Radek Czyz wrote:
> Okay, I'm convinced - my email must have been very criptic, somehow Jim 
> Hauxwell's follow-up is understood as mine...
>
> I just wanted the goddamn debug info ;_;

Sorry, we should have reread the original.

> I never expected any inlining, you can't do that with runtime cpu
> detection anyway. And no, I never wanted to keep two versions of the
> same code either. 

Okay, so how to get debug info without forcing Windows or Linux users to 
switch compiler? We can forget MS to understand AT&T syntax, so 
two ideas: make NASM output compatible debug info 
(unlikely, and structures wouldn't be there at all).
Or the opposite direction to what you decribed? Would it be possible to 
use Intel-syntax ASM for GCC as well? As far as I understand,  GAS 
supports it since  version 2.10, but I never tried to actually do it. 

gruel