[XviD-devel] [RELEASE CANDIDATE] v0.9.1

[Michael Militzer]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christoph Lampert" <chl at math.uni-bonn.de>
To: <xvid-devel at xvid.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:46 PM
Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] [RELEASE CANDIDATE] v0.9.1


> On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Michael Militzer wrote:
> > So that was my point: if we call the thing "stable", there shouldn't be
any
> > known bugs or incorrect code included.
>
> Hm, would it really be worth to throw out code which is deactivated
> anyway just for a small group of developers who are supposed to read
> the docs before starting to work with the code?
> We could add a README which tells just what you discussed:
> ACTIVATED code is (hopefully) bugfree. DEACTIVATED code isn't, that's why
> it's deactivated, but it's not worth debugging it, because there is a
> corrected version is in CVS already and will be released soon anyway.

qpel is activated by default on CVS HEAD and there's no notice that the code
is outdated.

Michael