[XviD-devel] Slow encoding - pondering the cause
Radek Czyz
syskin at ihug.com.au
Mon May 24 15:47:37 CEST 2004
Hi :)
J. Grant wrote:
> Is there an optimal resolution for encoding a video at bitrate 1000 ?
> For instance I could encode at 640x480 or at 1024x768, the former would
> have more quality in the fewer pixels and the latter would have less
> quality in more pixels. Which is more suitable? Perhaps there is a
> comparison graph?
As Christoph said, doom9.org is the best place to get encoding tips and
answers.
As for your question, people have invented a term "compressability" as
their rule of thumb. It's a ratio of first pass' encode (or just fixed
quant 2 encode) to your desired size. For xvid, it is usually
recommended to have this ratio at about 60..75%, although I personally
always prefer higher resolutions (all the way down to 40% is often
better in my eyes).
Please just don't make the mistake many people make - if different
encoder's settings give you better "compressability" then they do *not*
have to be better. Use "compressablity" as your rule of thumb for
resolution, and possibly for filters (up to a degree) but not for
encoder's settings.
Radek
More information about the XviD-devel
mailing list